Estamos aquí

Estamos aquí porque elegimos estar aquí. Elegimos explorar lo que somos porque no hay más qué explorar. La Vida que somos se torna hacia sí misma y penetra, inyecta su atención hacia sus componentes, y encuentra y entiende sus distintas cualidades, las formas en las que se manifiestan, sus naturalezas, y las interrelaciones entre sus partes constituyentes. Y encuentra en cada una de sus partes a ella misma, Vida, el núcleo original, sustancial, que fluye y aviva cada forma, y del cual cada una de ellas brota, surge, explora y experimenta - el motivo esencial de todo movimiento y cualidad.

Y dentro de cada forma y cualidad, así avivadas, la conciencia surge buscando también entender, y explora su mundo y sus circunstancias, sus otros reflejos y manifestaciones, para eventualmente realizar que hay una sola Vida que sustancia y compenetra todo su mundo. Y entonces se torna también hacia sí misma y penetra, continuando la búsqueda interior fractal, aparentemente interminable, en su deseo de conocerse, abarcarse, y expresarse con toda plenitud.

Words

Words interact with each other as operators and operands. They represent objects and concepts, cognizable entities, pointing to them as addresses into the substanding semantic space. As they arise into expression, they embody entities/values/statements and operations between them. And as they operate on one another, interact with each other and with the context in which they are expressed, they join and blend to embody new entities/values/statements. Like chemical elements and compounds operate on one another and with their environment, and either react and blend to embody new values, or simply sit with one another in inert company.

Nouns are the basest operands, embodying entities of sufficiently commonly recognized lore that they are useful to a relative majority of the people who use and encounter them. In correspondence to a mathematical context, they embody elements of a set/field/etc (Z, R, nxn matrices, etc).

Pronouns are implicit pointers to other entities, whether they be nouns or constructed values. They are prone to ambiguity if underspecified. In correspondence to a mathematical context, they embody variables (x, y, z, i, j, λ, δ, etc).

Verbs denote a certain action, change, movement, event - a specific type of entity/operand. These can be modified by other operators to produce new/more specific types of actions/changes/events.

Adjectives are unary operators, which emphasise a particular quality of an entity or value. These are as diverse in their effect, direction, texture, magnitude, abstraction, and meaning as the semantic space is vast. Upon operating on a value, the adjective blends with the value to produce another value.

• Adj(E1) = E2

Adverbs are unary operators, which operate on other operators. Again, the potential diversity of adverbs is as vast as the semantic space itself. Upon operating on an operator, the adverb blends with the operator to produce another operator. The transformations in matrix multiplication lend themselves fittingly as an analogue of the adverbial transformation.

• Adv(Adj1) = Adj2
• Adv(V1) = V2
• Adv1(Adv2) = Adv3

Conjunctions join other entities together in specific manners. The various conjunctions embody different "techniques" of joining their operands, just as one can pour one fluid onto another, pour them mutually into a new container, drip one fluid onto another drop by drop, pour and stir, forcefully blend, apply or remove heat to both or either of the operands, separate them from each other with various methods, or perform similar joinings with solids, gases, radiation, or any mixture of the above.

In mathematics, many operators exist that serve the role of joining. In computer science, the general parameterized function also embodies the infinitely wide, deep, vast, and complex space of operations that can be applied to a plurality of entities/values in order to produce other new entities/values. Or more precisely, to produce new pointers to entities/values in the semantic space.

In similar manner, prepositions operate as a subset of conjunctions, specialized to indicate relative physical placement.

Determiners "tweak" other entities/values in order to point more precisely towards that which one wishes to evoke. Subscripts and superscripts in mathematical notation serve a similar role.

Interjections are mostly expressions of intent and/or of emotional state. As such, they mostly focus on the expresser rather than on his circumstances or on other objects.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

I often see some words used incompletely. Words that operate as conjunctions, for instance (though not always syntactically categorized as such), often lack or underspecify one or more of their parameters, which causes the resulting pointer to be ambiguous, and open to wide interpretation by the receiver. Ambiguity often leads to miscommunication, and this can disrupt and distort the flow of information and resources in a system such as the social one we inhabit.

Examples of such words are:

Need:

Indicates the factors that are required for one state to change to another. The needed operands for this word, then, are:

1. The former state.
2. The factors.
3. The target state.

• Need(FormerState, NeededFactors, TargetState)

Usage example: "I need a massage in order to feel good." Parameter values:

1. Former state (implied): My present state, in which I do not feel good.
2. Factors: Receiving a massage.
3. Target state: A state in which I feel good.

Rarely would this sentence be spoken in this extended form. Most often one says "I need a massage", and most of its operands are implied, if only vaguely. In particular, two operands in the operation of "Need" are often elided. The former state is most often assumed to be the present time (or whichever time the tense of the statement indicates - past, future, etc). The target state is most often assumed to be a "better"/"more desirable" state than the former, though what that signifies is generally left to the receiver's (and often the speaker's) ambiguity.

Commonly uttered statements of "need" very often focus only on the factors needed, for the statements tend to be evoked from desires, often inchoate, and not from a clear understanding of:

1. The process of change they describe, of
2. The target state this process intends to reach, nor of
3. The former state of affairs.

Very often, the meaning of "better" is unclear even in the speaker's cognition itself, and such ambiguity produces expression that dissipates energy in unclear/ineffective directions.

Too:

Indicates that a certain quality of an entity lies beyond a certain threshold, which revokes some specific status from that entity. The needed operands for this word, then, are:

1. The entity.
2. The quality.
3. The revoked status.

• Too(Entity, Quality, RevokedStatus)

Usage example: "The food is too hot for me to eat it." Parameter values:

1.  Entity: Food
2.  Quality: Hot
3.  Revoked Status: Being eatable by me

Again, rarely would this sentence be uttered in its entirety. Most often a person would simply say "The food is too hot." or "It's too hot.", and the surrounding context - sitting at a dinner table, considering a plate of food atop it - would serve to imply the meaning with sufficient accuracy.

But if he were standing beside the dinner table, considering another person's plate, is the implied meaning clear? Is the food too hot for the speaker to eat? Or too hot for the other person to eat? Or does he find the warm air around him uncomfortable?

And if he were a food engineer standing beside a giant vat of industrially produced food, what is the meaning then? Is the food too hot for the current processing stage? Too hot for him to eat? Or is it the steel vat that is too hot?

Though such examples may seem inane, they intend to convey the fact that ambiguity (and thus miscommunication) can arise from small differences in wording and context that are often overlooked.

And if we say: "The world is too screwed up", "The system is too corrupt", "People are too stupid", "That problem is too hard", or "That's too bad", are we conveying useful information? Do we ourselves know the meaning we want to transmit? Can we identify the actual operands upon which "Too" operates? Or do we use such expressions simply as long placeholders to signify a general sense of dislike, frustration, unwillingness, and "UGGGGGH", while sending blame away in some vague direction?

So:

Indicates that a certain quality of an entity reaches or exceeds a certain threshold, which grants the entity some specific status. The operands of this word are:

1. The entity.
2. The quality.
3. The granted status.

• So(Entity, Quality, GrantedStatus)

Its meaning is effectively equivalent to that of "Too", but with opposite connotations for the status. "So" has the entity gaining a status past the threshold, while "Too" has it losing a status. For instance, the following two sentences are equivalent:

• The food is SO hot that I cannot it.
• The food is TOO hot for me to eat it.

The ambiguities and risks that arise with "So" (as well as with "Enough") are very similar to those found when using "Too". The GrantedStatus or RevokedStatus parameter is SO often absent, actually, that both words are presently widely used as synonyms of "Very", a unary operator. And while some semantic overlap between words is common in languages, I posit it is important to retain the meaning of words that serve a unique purpose, so as to not forget their structures, that is their operator functionality, from the widespread language as a whole.

I propose we all strive to clearly understand what we mean before we speak it. Only then can we truly direct the intent of our expressions towards clear targets, and allow the flow of intent and information through each of us and between us all to be clear, smooth, continuous, and effective.

Ob-

From ChatGPT:

Obscene: The prefix "ob-" in "obscene" suggests something that is morally offensive or indecent, often associated with being contrary to accepted social norms.

Object: The prefix "ob-" in "object" indicates something that is opposed or confronted. It implies an entity that is perceived or acted upon, standing in contrast to the subject.

Obsession: The prefix "ob-" in "obsession" implies a persistent and intrusive preoccupation that opposes rational thought or control, often creating a sense of obstruction or blockade.

Objective: The prefix "ob-" in "objective" suggests something that is independent of personal biases or preferences. It implies a perspective or viewpoint that stands apart from subjective influences.

Obstacle: The prefix "ob-" in "obstacle" indicates something that stands in the way, opposes progress, or creates a hindrance. It signifies an impediment or barrier to be overcome.

Obstetrician: The prefix "ob-" in "obstetrician" refers to a medical specialist who deals with the care and delivery of babies. Here, it denotes the work of bringing new life into the world, opposing or confronting the challenges of childbirth.

Obligation: The prefix "ob-" in "obligation" suggests a binding commitment or duty that opposes personal freedom or choice. It implies a sense of responsibility or moral requirement.

Obliterate: The prefix "ob-" in "obliterate" signifies a complete erasure or destruction. It conveys the notion of something being completely wiped out or opposed to its previous existence.

Obey: The prefix "ob-" in "obey" implies compliance or submission to authority, rules, or commands. It suggests yielding or opposing one's own will in favor of another's.

Obese: The prefix "ob-" in "obese" indicates an excessive or overabundant accumulation of body fat, suggesting a condition that goes against the normal or healthy state.

Obtuse: The prefix "ob-" in "obtuse" implies a dullness or lack of sharpness, whether in reference to angles or mental acuity. It suggests a condition of being opposed to or deviating from the expected or desired state.

Obstinate: The prefix "ob-" in "obstinate" signifies a stubborn or unyielding disposition, suggesting opposition to persuasion or change.

Obtain: The prefix "ob-" in "obtain" conveys the idea of acquiring or gaining something, often suggesting a deliberate effort or opposition to existing conditions in order to secure it.

Observe: The prefix "ob-" in "observe" implies closely watching, paying attention to, or confronting a subject with intent. It suggests an active engagement and opposition to being indifferent or unaware.

Obvious: The prefix "ob-" in "obvious" suggests something that is easily seen, confronted, or opposed. It implies a state of being clear, evident, or straightforward.

From Online Searches:

• Obsession:
• From siege, Obsideo. From ob+sedeo (against+sit) (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obsideo#Latin).
• To siege.
• Obstacle/Obstand:
• From (ob + sta):
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obstaculum#Latin
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obsto#Latin
• To stand against.
• Obscene:
• Perhaps from ob "in front of" (ob + caenum) (against+filth).
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obscene
• In front of filth.
• Object:
• From obicio, ob+iacio, (against + throw, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obicio#Latin)
• Sense of "purpose, thing aimed at" is from early 15c., from Latin obiectus "that which presents itself to the sight."
• Meaning "that toward which a cognitive act is directed" is from 1580s.
• Against throw, against action. That against which action is directed.
• That which is opposite to the subject.
• Objective:
• In relation to an object. Impersonal, unbiased.
• https://www.etymonline.com/word/objective
• Obstetrician:
• From ob+sta (against/opposite+stand)
• https://www.etymonline.com/word/obstetric
• (S)he who stands opposite (the childbearer).
• Obligate:
• From ob+ligar (against+tie).
• To tie against/restrict.
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obligo#Latin
• Obliterate/Oblivion:
• From ob+levis (against+smooth), or obliviscor
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obliviscor#Latin
• From being neglected, forgotten, erased.
• Obese:
• From ob+edo (Against/away+eat)
• Eat away (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obedo#Latin)
• Obtuse:
• From ob+tundo (against+batter, beat, strike, blunt, dull)
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obtuse
• From blunt, dull. Narrow-minded or dull. Unsharp, made unsharp by beating.
• Obstinate:
• From ob+sta (to stand against).
• Equiroot to obstand, obstacle.
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obstinate
• Obtain:
• From ob+tenere (against + hold)
• (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obtain).
• To gain something, focused on the effort or opposition to existing conditions in order to secure it.
• Observe:
• From ob+servare (against+watch, keep)
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/observe
• To watch.
• Obvious:
• From Ob+Via (against + way)
• Against the way; ready, easily seen.
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obvious
• Suggests something that is easily seen, confronted, or opposed. It implies a state of being clear, evident, or straightforward.

Minimum Effort

The method of minimum effort was ingrained in my mind decades go.

In school, where the aims superseded reality. Where what we got seemed more important than what we were or what we knew, somehow....

People around me encouraged me and others to aim and focus on what we got, what we gained, what we attained, rather than on what we were, who we were, and what we learned. In school. And the lesser effort that we expended in order to attain a particular goal, the more "prestige" or "awe" was gained or perceived.

Then the goal to pursue became not growth or learning or truth. It became the attainment of something external, demonstrable. Grades, awards, ranks. Effects, regardless of the causes. Ends, regardless of the means.

The focus on "what we get" instead of "what we are". "Who we are", "what we grow into".

Millions of students and people and children and adults have this particular idea ingrained in their minds gradually, repeatedly, day in and day out, in schools, in corporations, in friend circles, in families. And every single time it amplifies the problem. When the focus is what we get and not who we are, we shall focus on the outwards, on what it looks like, on the outside, and it is then easy to forget and neglect the core of what we are, around which all the clothing and curtains around it hang. And through continued neglect, the channels to our core gather dust, rust, rot, and we lose contact with whom we truly are.

The Song of the Golden Dragon

The Song of the Golden Dragon tells the story
of He who felt His was the glory.
With wings of gold and breath of fire,
He sought to quench every desire.

His wings aloft, He flew up high,
for all to see Him in the sky.
And though He glided, swept, and soared,
the others didn't look above.

They rushed and worried about petty things,
such trifles as "to lose or win".
"What's wrong with them, could they be blind?
They only need to leave behind

their grip on what's so clearly junk,
and so soon would they escape their funk.
If they but knew that they could fly,
would they not join me in the sky?"

"To cure your ills, just look at Me,
notice My glory and then you'll see
your little worries need not fray
your spirit year after year away."

Trying again, this time He roared,
a thunderous cry that shook the floor.
The others heard, and some were stunned,
others applauded, others shunned.

But no one, He saw, understood
the message that He thought they should:
the golden wings and breath of fire
were theirs to wield if they just aimed higher.

So around the world He flew
searching for someone else that knew
the same core insight He felt His,
and seeing Him, would say "Yes! The Truth is This!"

What He really sought was recognition,
He craved others to see His Own fruition.
But no matter how many others claimed His praise,
none cured the hollow pain in his blaze.

His puzzling failure dragged him down
To the cave where shame and dark abound.
his gold scales tarnished, his fire diffused,
his great wings weakened from lack of use.

As time went on, he no more dared
to truly from his center share.
his truth was real, but no one saw
the essence that should make them awe.

So dragon shriveled, then forgot
his nature was not of earthly lot.
his steps turned heavy with gathered mire
and became a slave of his desires.

Oblivious, soon down there he walked
amidst the muddled, weary lot.
In fog of fear and leashed with shame,
he now looked down with no true aim.

And yet his fire stayed alive
just waiting to be let outside.
Every so often, it burned bright
to test whether the time was ripe.

As bright it burned, so sharp the shame
snarled and spit it out as blame.
he cried with anguish and regret
of the day he let himself forget.

And yet this pain was a reminder:
beyond it must lay something kinder.
But no seeing nor praise had cured his crave.
By which technique could he be saved?

And as he felt, and thought, and pondered,
sometimes he'd feel a flash of wonder.
Something that knew that all was right,
that each step was graced with delight.

He poked and prodded at his core,
enough to pierce a little bore.
And when he peeked, careful and keen,
the emptiness finally felt seen.

A stream of energy rushed through
from his own mind to this space anew.
And then the realization came:
twas but himself for which he yearned.

Twas not the others who could provide
what can only come from inside.
Our selves we first must love and meet,
then can we share ourselves complete.

And one by one, each truth then dawned
as his fire woke up and yawned
a licking flame to test the ground
where it awoke when it was found.

His wings, so long curled up and stored
rose and extended more and more.
And day by day, apace he woke,
to find a world covered in smoke.

In fog of fear and smoke of rush,
he saw dreams shattered and purpose crushed.
Same as him, others craved too
for other eyes to see their truth.

Once on that path, he understands,
the path to Self must be self-danced.
Each step and fall can help us learn
if we attend and strive to discern.

And now awake, astride, afire,
he sees it's needless to admire.
Our gifts and skills are best applied
to treat each other with love and kind.

Let all of us receive the light
that will show us our real might.
No oracle to guide the way
except within, which always stays.

And in the others' wandering eyes,
remember that past their disguise
the life within burns just the same,
they feel its love and joy and pain.

Let us practice the art of care,
by looking in deep as we dare
to know ourselves to the very core,
that center whence all life explores.

Seeing life here, we see life there.
It's suddenly just everywhere.
And if the rules of love we apply,
soon will we all together fly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61h3vti7flg

Image by ChatGPT:

Trust allows Flow

To cultivate trust

Is to clean and heal and open the channels

Through which flow flows.

Flow of sharing

Flow of distribution

Flow of emotions

Flow of ideas

Flow of stories

Flow of objects

Flow of peoples

Flow of materials

Flow of actions

Flow of effort

Flow of care

Flow of energy 

Flow. All flow.

Through open and healthy channels,

Flow moves and permeates

All corners where it can help

Relieve and fortify pressures,

From the overs to the unders

Uninterrupted and unhesitant.

We can identify where flow is checked.

In our pursed lips,

In our locked purses,

In our evasive eyes,

In our stemmed impulses,

In our fearful rushes,

In our despondent spirits,

In our hesitant words,

In our unchosen compulsions,

In our clogged throats,

In our secret desires,

In our hidden resentments,

In our paralyzed choice.

If we take the time to feel the block,

To understand it, and to know it,

We can know how it came to be.

And only then can we take on the task

Of neutralizing the cause whence it came

If we so will.

Psychometry

Three days ago I practiced a psychometry exercise for the first time in my life. It consisted of feeling the properties of an object that I did not know nor see beforehand, or of its relationship to its owner, by simply holding (not grasping) the object in one hand, wrapped in a paper towel, and with eyes closed, speaking out all the words/sensations/qualities that came to me as I attempted to feel the object with attention. I found the results valuable, and I would like to share them with others.

I practiced this technique four times, each time with a different object, and with immediate feedback from the object's owner only on the fourth object. These were the objects used, in the following order:

1. Tusk pendant.
2. Swiss army knife.
3. Translucent vial with liquid.
4. Watch.

The objects were revealed to me only after the end of the exercise.

The feather is explained below.

Here are the attributes/qualities/words I spoke out for the various objects, in original Spanish and translated English, color-coded according to the following subjective accuracy scale:

• Certain relation
• Likely relation
• Dubious relation
• Relation not found

(Tusk pendant)

• Chocolate - Chocolate (due to the rope color)
• Medicina - Medicine
• Águila - Eagle (The pendant used to be attached to an eagle's feather, also seen above).
• Lazo - Rope/Cord
• Triángulo, pirámide - Triangle, Pyramid (due to the tusk's pointed shape)
• Blanco - White

(Swiss army knife)

• Rosado - Pink
• Verde - Green
• Martillo/cuchillo - Hammer/knife
• Ocho - Eight
• Cordón - Cord
• Amarillo - Yellow
• De arriba - From above.

(Translucent vial)

• Maquillaje de mujer - Woman's makeup (due to container shape)
• Polvo - Powder
• Salida - Exit
• Papel - Paper
• Rojo - Red (due to the liquid's color - grape juice)
• Un feto formado de luz - A fetus made of light
• Verde - Green
• Zipper - Zipper

(Watch)

• Suave - Soft (Wristband texture)
• Agujero - Hole (Due to the holes in the wristband)
• Hilo - Thread (Due to the buckle needle in the wristband)
• Aguja - Needle (The watch needles)
• Blanco - White (Color of watch face)
• Azul - Blue (Color of wristband)
• Origen: Nevada - Origin: Nevada
• Material: Seda - Material: Silk (The wristband felt soft like silk)
• Material: Plástico - Material: Plastic (Synthetic wristband material)
• Emociones: Libertad/desdén/tristeza - Emotions: Freedom/disdain/sadness
• The watch was bought one day before an important final test that he failed.

I do not summarize these results in numerical form, for I do not believe it is within my current capabilities to quantify randomness and probabilities in the vast and intricate semantic space. I also feel unable to record in a provable manner the subtle impressions I felt beneath each word. For example, the triangle/pyramid words, though they do not precisely describe the tusk, came from an inner sensation of pointiness, which matched almost exactly what I felt when I saw the tusk for the first time, and the feeling of silk I felt within matched what I felt when I first saw the wristband texture.

From my own perspective, however, the degree of accuracy attained seems sufficient for me to ascertain the existence and validity of psychic abilities in humans like myself.

Here is the dialogue that occurred.

And in recorded audio: https://recorder.google.com/b84b9da0-c042-4e6a-a3f0-4a64e8eaa27a

(Tusk pendant)

2:49 Estoy listo

3:10 Chocolate

3:29 Medicina

3:59 Águila

4:14 Veo nada

4:21 Sólo siento los conceptos.

4:43 Yo te escucho.

5:08 Pregunto de dónde viene. *Me dice* por España.

5:18 Pregunto de quién es. No hay respuesta.

5:41 Lazo

5:55 _____ismo ???

6:07 Triángulo, pirámide.

6:18 Hmm.

6:45 Pregunto el color, y viene sólo blanco. Suot.??

7:14 Cómo sientes? Hay más información que obtener? Emm, estás muy aproximado. Has dicho palabras que tienen que ver con la historia del objeto, o su función. Gracias.

7:34 Siento que este objeto es suficiente. Te lo doy.

7:44 En el ejercicio muestran, dicen hacerlo con uno. Pero ya que tenemos tres - quieres ver qué cogiste? No. Voy a darte el siguiente. Seguimos con el segundo. Sí.

(Swiss army knife)

8:19 Rosado, siento.

8:27 Verde.

8:34 ____En piedra ver_____????

8:41 Mmmhmm. De dónde viene?

8:58 SSaaa...

9:00 Mar...

9:03 Martillo/cuchillo?

9:16 Hmm.

9:21 Ocho? Cordón?

9:42 Amarillo?

9:53 De arriba. ¿De dónde viene? De arriba.

10:10: (Another voice)

10:18: Me siento bien ya con este objeto. Quieres seguir con el tercero? Sí.

(Translucent vial)

10:29: (clears throat).

11:03: Como maquillaje de mujer....

11:10: Y Polvo.

11:13: (Another voice)

11:33: Salida? Salida?

11:48: Papel?

11:56: Rojo.

12:07: ¿De dónde viene?

12:22: Los pelos de mi cabeza se sienten que se paran.

12:28: Muy cerca del tope, hasta arriba.

12:44 Sigo sintiendo los pelos de mi cabeza.

12:54 Un como...

12:56 feto formado de luz,

13:02 Verde.

13:24: Sssi... Zipper?

13:28 NNnnn. (JC)

13:35 Aaahhh...

(Watch)

13:45 Probemos algo último, que es si... si me viene algo... este, este es el tercero, verdad? Sí. Probemos... si yo digo algo, y tú me dices si tiene... relación. OK, yo te guío. Diciendo "Tengo esta información" o "no tengo esta información". De acuerdo.

14:24 ¿Tienes otro objeto? Sí, tengo otro.

14:37: Suave.

14:45: Me dissa ___ nave__ ???.

14:54: Agujero?

14:57: Con un hilo de un... de un... de un aguijón. (Una aguja?) Como un hilo o una aguja muy delgada, introduciéndose en un agujero.

15:09: La aguja es correcta. Color? El color es... blanco blanco.

15:23: Tiene partes blancas, es correcto.

15:35: Azul también tiene... pansión___???.... (bzzz bzzzz).

15:40: Es correcto.

15:50: Origen?

15:51: En mi estómago se siente algo... así como que lo siente en el estómago. O al menos resuena.

16:00: Origen...

16:07: Nevada, me viene.

16:19 Material?

16:23 Material.

16:25: Sssssssssedaaa??

16:44: Sseeda, pero anteriormente, me pareció plástico.

16:56: Aguijón?

17:06: Aaaahhhhhhh... Qué emoción te das cuenta?

17:12: Libertad? Y desdén?

17:35: Tristeza me viene...

17:43: Me siento contento...

17:47: con el ejercicio.

17:56: Gracias.

18:00: Ha sido un placer.

18:20: Hola. Hola! Bienvenido al mundo! El mundo!

(Explanation & Discussion)

18:26: Eh, bueno. Voy a explicarte uno por uno, OK? Muy bien. Te acuerdas de lo que dijiste? Poco. Poco. Abre el cuarto. El cuarto... comenzamos... fue aguijón? aguja, agujero? No me acuerdo.

18:50: Yo creo... sí, fue el que dije blanco, y que luego dije azul. Sí.

19:00: (revelando el primer objeto). Ah! Ah??? Es un reloj... tiene agujas! Lógico! Sí, tiene agujas!

19:11: Y me conmovió mucho lo que dijiste de la emoción. Y por qué? Porque este reloj lo compré el día antes del examen de hotelería... Ahh!

19:21: Fue un rush muy muy tremendo en el que casi llegaba tarde... y al final no aprobé el examen. Y... todo está en este reloj.

19:29: Wow! ____es de donde... ____ Jenot..____

19:35 Y libertad... me suena libertad, como porque estabas saliendo del examen, como que "ah!". Eh, ssí. Comfort, cuando salí del examen... pero claro, este objeto me acompañó en todas esas emociones. Así que está impregnado de eso, de alguna forma.

19:52: Aguja! Blanco! Azul! HAHAHAHAHA!

19:58: Este no fue el que dije rosado?

20:00 No.

20:02: Tú dijiste... (HAHAHAHA). Blanco y azul!

20:07: Esta parte la perfeccionaste más.

20:09: Estuviste muy confundido con eh, bueno no... dijiste una palabra al menos, sobre cada uno, adequate.

20:17: HAHAHAHA! AGUJA! Y y... ehh.. aguja que, que se mete en el hoyo... (mostrando la aguja que cierra el broche).

20:26: Exacto. Y el cuero es sintético, así que es plástico.

20:32: Cuál es la otra cosa que dije? Seda? Seda...

20:35: Me acuerdo del tercero, que dijiste que era maquillaje de mujer.

20:40: Sí... __O algo...___

20:48: Es no es.. está, está como en formato de maquilla de mujer, pero es una, un extracto para dormir.

20:54: Ahh!!

20:56 Tiene __aragana__, y...

20:58: Ok, ok. Este es el que dije que era rosado?

21:02: Síii.. dijiste rojo. Rojo, sí sí, dije rojo.

21:10: No te digo que es ROJO, pero...

21:13: Tiene tonos rojos.

21:15: Pero no es, no es... no es transparente, digamos.

21:18: Que, esto está reenvasado, que lo envasé, en sirope de uva. Ahhh!

21:24: Así que, rojo... las uvas rojas... viene de uvas rojas.

21:26: Entonces... wow, ok!

21:33: Segundo objeto. Hmm?

21:38: Qué es lo que dije? Dije... dije martillo cuchillo? Sí. Con este?? Sí. JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA!!!!

21:51: Pero de primero dijiste mar, __piedra__, martillo cuchillo se te salió de alguna forma.

21:57: Sí! Yo, así como que... "¿martillo cuchillo?" martillo cuchillo!! Y dije viene del mar! Y luego viene de arriba!

22:07: Sí.

22:09: ¿Qué? Pues, no sé de donde viene, vdd...

22:15: No viene del mar! No.

22:17: Pero es marrr...tillo!

22:20: Y sí, se sintió como mm... mar... martillo!

22:23: ¿Qué viste? Una imagen, una palabra? Un...

22:26: Nnnnaaanna... Un... impulso de... concepto, de sílaba. No una imagen. Era más como marr.. marrrrtillo.

22:36: MARTILLO CUCHILLO!

22:39: Primer objeto.

22:43: Tú me dijiste una palabra que me, eh... conmovió mucho llamada, que decías águila. Sí. Blanco. Sí. Lazo. Sí. Chocolate. Sí. Y medicina dijste. Mmm... emoción, qué emoción te provocaba? Bueno, no te pregunté.

23:07: Hmmmm.......

23:14: Hmm, no, el impulso no fue emocional.

(mostrando el objeto).

23:24: Blanco es! Sí. Perate, qué es lo que dije, dije blanco? Dijiste águila. Dije águila? Sí. No es un, no es una garra de águila. Pero, el collar estaba antes, tenía una pluma de águila antes, una águila de Sils.

23:42: Ah! LAZO! Sí. DIJE LAZO? Sí. HAHAHAHAHAHA!! DIJE LAZO!!!! JAJAJAJA!!!! DIJE LAZO!!

23:55: Dije lazo!! JAJAJA! Lazo, águila!

23:57: Dijiste España. Posiblemente el jabalí fue de España, no lo sé.

24:01: Lo compré en Etsy, en una tienda __islámica__.

24:08: Un jabalí. Cuando dije España, no me, me... me, auto-, me, casi me auto-corregí, diciéndome "no es que Jean Claude es de España, entonces es de España".

24:20: No sí, sí, soy yo del idioma en que te hablé.

24:23: Sí, y sa, saber de ti, te conozco.

24:30: Dije lazo. Águila. Lazo! LAZO! Por qué dije lazo???

24:39: Más del 50% eres exitoso.

24:44: ¿Perate, qué es lo que dicen, hits? Felicitar! Felicitar!

24:47: Eh, felicidades! Ehh! Gracias! Gracias Jean Claude! Ha sido un placer.

24:52: Ehh, cómo se dije? Grac... Gracias. Gracias. Gracias.

24:56: Agradecido? Sí, me siento agradecido. Me siento agradecido por esta oportunidad que me diste, que me trajiste objetos, muchas gracias. Y viniste a verme, y a guiarme en este proceso.

25:10: Y... estoy... estoy desarrollando algo! Me siento, me siento muy, me siento muy feliz!

25:18: Te cuento una cosa, oye... yo también a veces he sentido, esto, sobre todo en noviembre cuando estaba con el tema del agua destilada y esto. Que, muchas veces tenía presentimientos, digamos en el tren...

25:30: Y pensaba... oh, va a pasar el revisor. Y veía y nada. Luego llegaba y se abría la puerta y pasaba el revisor. JAJAJA. JAJAJAJAJA.

25:42: Oye y... tú te metiste en un curso de esto? O... sí.

25:46: Pero, qué es un curso anual, o...

25:48: No, es un curso... el que estoy siguiendo es un curso de 28 días. Ok.

25:53: __Hágalo__ por 28 días.

25:54: Y, tiene una membresía anual.

25:57: Y cómo supiste de esto?

25:58: Me apareció un ad.

26:00: En YouTube? Un documental, largo? No, en Facebook. Pero sí era largo.

26:05: Pero fue bien interesante, porque no ___venía___. No me acuerdo porqué, pero me acuerdo que me senté en el tren, vi el facebook, y estaba así, medio pasando, y puc, y vi ese ad, y puc! No sé porqué, pero me atrajo.

26:15: Me atrajo! ¿Cuál, ese mismo? Sí. Ahh!

26:20: Hace unos días, estaba en YouTube. Y estaba mirando esto, esto de Human Design, un poco... aprendiendo. Pero me sale este app. Pero no era ___ cualquiera___. Me pareció, "oye! 30 minutos pero quiero verlo!"

26:34: También lo sentiste? Sí. Era de Silva o era esto de Mindvalley?

26:39: Este, este mismo hombre. Ah, este mismo. Habló con Silva para que él fuera la cara de, de eso.

26:45: Sííi.... ehhh. viste la historia completa, entonces? Sí. Donde es un ingeniero de software, que llega a San Francisco, y que lo...

26:53: El tipo llamaba a... abogados... Sí... viste el mismo anuncio que yo! Sí.

27:00: El mismo anuncio. Porque yo también lo vi, yendo a la casa, a Elgg desde Zürich. Vi... el anuncio, lo vi y me atrajo!

27:10: Ya había visto Mindvalley por aquí y por allá, y así que como que "sí sí, está bueno". Pero de repente, algo me atrajo, digamos.

27:17: Saber... si esto no es tanto de sincronicidad mas bien del logaritmo, o... no sé, algo.

27:24: Pero, interesante que al menos haya sido algo que sí me interese, no un app de juegos que no me interese. Y ehh... pues ahora estoy leyendo el libro de Silva. Silva Silva.

27:34: Ah sí? El original. Ahh bueno!

27:39: Qué cool! Oye, me sorprendiste cuando vi el nombre Silva, y yo "eh?" je.

27:45: Yo no vi que decía Silva, decía... ah, tal vez dice The Silva Method.

27:50 Sí, ehh, bueno. Qué cool, Antonio, oye! Bueno, esto, lo voy a grabar. Bueno, voy a dejarlo grabando un ratito.

27:57: Eh, dónde dice Silva? Ahh, Silva Ultramind System. Claro, chac, chac.

28:05: Yo también estoy muy interesado, eh.

28:06: Ahora estoy, estoy, me interés ha... ha aumentado. Practice the Psychometry with a friend. Done! Cool.

28:16: Perate, quiero tomarle foto a esto, por favor. Por favor!

28:22: Martillo cuchillo! Martillo cuchillo!?!? A mí me pareció que "what? the heck es esto? Por qué estoy... por qué martillo cuchillo?" Martillo Cuchillo.

28:39: Lana___... _____ a los objetos?

28:40: Sí, esto de frente.

28:48: Seda? Plástico? Seda, sí, para mí esto, no es seda, claro, pero, tiene la... la energía, la textura! un poco de seda. La, la suavidad. La fineza. Yo sí le voy a dar vuelta.

29:08: _______ lado.

29:13: Bueno, puede ser por el... el estarcido de seda. Sabes qué es? No sé que es eso, el esparcido de seda.

29:22: El estarcido de seda es con lo que imprimen los números en los relojes. Ah sí? Sí.

29:28: Algunos, no todos. ____ Pero, hay una técnica llamada estarcido de seda.

29:34: Nunca había escuchado de esa palabra en mi vida. Esparcido. Sí.

29:59: WOW.

30:00: Aplicaciones en la vida cotidiana de esta habilidad.

30:08: Aplicaciones? Sí. En la vida cotidiana.

Celebrate our Failures

Celebrate our failures.

I think we humans do not celebrate/acknowledge/display our failures and pains nearly as much as we do our successes and pleasures.

This is likely because:
- Acknowledgement of failure is perceived as a display of weakness, whereas
- Acknowledgement of success is perceived as a display of strength.

And in an individualistic, competitive context, the strong survive and the weak succumb.

But in a shared, cooperative context, relative strength and weakness become but variances in any mixture of dimensions within the one flow that induce flavor, diversity, and multitudes of values and products for everyone to experience and share. Just like our global market has achieved in recent decades, to a point.

And in this shared, cooperative context, relative strength and weakness gradually become obsolete terms. What is then of import is truth and communication, so that the correct information, resources, and efforts may be efficiently distributed, and reach all the recipients that may best use them, who can then continue to share their own gifts and products forward within the one flow.

Thus I believe that acknowledgement of Truth is of value. Of both successes and failures. Of both pains and pleasures. It begins with acknowledgement to oneself - only then can it bloom onto acknowledgement to others.

I believe such a practice may help us realize more clearly the hidden fears and shames we carry within. Once they are seen and felt, we can then choose to change or dissolve them so that we may be liberated from them, and again tread the spaces both inner and outer, which these hidden stagnancies once blocked and befouled.

And as we become thus liberated, Truth more freely flows through us, out from us, into us, and amongst us. Then I believe we naturally realize the vast benefit of confidently stepping forward into a shared, cooperative society, and of leaving needless competition behind.

Image by DALL-E 2.

Description of Ecstatic Dance

(From a personal message sent tonight):

..................

So I thought to send you a description of that angle of my experience, from what I remember from that night. As my mind conversed with my body, impulsed and guided by music the mediator and lubricant, all the pending expressions between the two were said out loud. My mind flowed through the music and conversed with the body through simultaneous thought, bodily impulse, and dance, each moment a new stage for the next lines in the dialogue. And saying and saying and saying and saying out loud each one, all they had left pending to say, eventually they found a synthesis, or found themselves with nothing left to say, and then they both felt peace. Peace, mutual understanding, and an unneed to do anything at all. And then the voice of my soul could be heard... soft and clear, distinct from the relative ruckus that my mind-body duality was engaged in before. I felt then a dialogue, calm and steady and dotted with mental disbelief, between my mind and my soul. A channel of communication was reached via a point of transmission somewhere in my head, and I strove to listen and understand the signals that my soul sent. I then remembered the life that each of us is in essence, and how that life living through my body is the exact same as that which lived and looked out from all the dancing bodies around me, despite the mental separations with which my mind continues to categorize and feel useful and worthy. And at the end of the music set, when the speakers sounded with a chanting choir, I felt resonance between this music and the mind/soul connection I felt, and I prayed for the growth of the realisation within all of us about the same life that we all are and share. .....................

Macromulticellularity

The fact that countries fight to capture/absorb more territory/resources into their domain

is a symptom of the (self/prize/recognition/fear)-centered perspective that still dominates nations' politics.

It means the nation believes itself to be the owner,

the author of the choices of its regions and citizens,

and not their steward.

A successful predator,

and not an attentive caretaker.

The former has succeeded and passively relishes on its soon-neglected trophies,

while the latter is on active duty - in living, growing engagement with its parts.

In a balanced system,

Land and citizens are not conquered and prized possessions of the nations,

but are voluntary contributors to the well-being of their overarching domains,

for the benefit of themselves and of their neighbors,

with the knowledge that all together

can each of them be better off

than all of them apart.

Macromulticellularity.

And when this is not the case,

let the peoples split and shift

until we learn

what we have not yet learned.

Moon Talk

The moon shines bright

On my path tonight.

I feel a doubt, so inside I talk.

I feel a clear "just go on, walk".

If tonight is time to ask the questions

Then I shall ask.

How do I align my efforts and my finances to the purpose of my soul?

"Continue. Expressing, showing, fully being and doing."

And will I know it before it happens?

"No."

Trust remains.

And what is my purpose?

"To be fully you."